The Big Short, Big Money, and Greed

In the past week I watched The Big Short and Concussion. Two movies that were out last year. The Big Short had some Oscar nominations. Concussion didn’t. After watching both, it’s simple to see why that happened.

  1. It’s easy to blast at Wall Street.
  2. We don’t DARE take down the new American god of football.

After watching The Big Short, I bought the book and finished it quickly. Michael Lewis is a great writer and the book moved quickly, even though he had to slog through a lot of financial jargon.

The Big Short and Concussion have the underlying themes of big money and greed. Here are some conclusions Lewis makes in his book (and just simply substitute “NFL” for “Wall Street” to understand how both behemoths truly operate).

Concerning all the changes made after the crash in 2008 (this would include both Bush and Obama administrations and legislation that followed):

The changes were camouflage. They helped to distract outsiders from the truly profane event: the growing misalignment of interests between the people who trafficked in financial risk and the wider culture.

For instance, I was in a quick conversation with someone after the second round of handouts were given (this time in the Obama administration). The stranger asked, “Well, I wonder how much money I’ll get from this new round of handouts.” I answered: “We can figure this out right now. In the last ten years have you given obscene amounts of money to any political party or candidate?” The response: “No.” My answer: “Then you get nothing.” (Which is pretty much how it worked under Bush and Obama in their “plans.”

There is a misunderstanding on “investing” on Main Street and “investing” on Wall Street. They are two very different animals, which may be why Warren Buffet lives in Omaha.

Greed on Wall Street was a given — almost an obligation… The line between gambling and investing is artificial and thin.

(Greed in the NFL is a given as well. The line between caring about the players and making a TON of money off the violence of the sport is thin as well. It may be just as artificial.)

Concerning the bailouts:

What are the odds that people will make smart decisions about money if they don’t need to make smart decisions — if they can get rich making dumb decisions?

The promises made by the Treasury Department before the first bailout evaporated once Congress gave the money to be doled out to banks that had willingly crashed the economy. Millions of dollars had already been paid to CEOs to actually leave their banks while billions were lost to investors.

Both movies and Lewis’s book have stirred my thinking once again.

It is only a reminder that we haven’t learned lessons… and this current election style will only further our ignorance. Those who think Bernie Sanders has a way out by “taxing Wall Street speculation” really haven’t paid attention to his plan, either. To his credit, he puts the “plan” out there for people to see. (He knows, like any good politician) people won’t really READ that thing, or understand it if they attempt to read it. He counts on that because if people DID pay attention they’d realize he isn’t going after the speculation as much as he is taxing regular “main street” investment.

I could give a response to Clinton’s claims and Trump’s claims as well, but they don’t pretend to NOT like Wall Street like Bernie claims. (I think he genuinely doesn’t like them. I just also think his “plan” is more political smoke and mirrors.)

What is clear from both movies is greed is a nasty thing. It captures the best of us if we’re not careful. And you certainly can’t get ahead of it in a secular society and legislate it away. It is truly a matter of the heart. And therein lies the rub. We have scrubbed religious discussion from the public square and so to speak of things as being “legal but immoral” just ring hollow. We want to scream that something “illegal” happened. We don’t want to scream something “immoral” happened… and that is a shame. (But then again, shame is a taboo word as well.)

We need our hearts examined and it all comes at a time when we don’t want a sense of “moral” obligation in our world.


So, the film “Noah” comes out. I have only this question for those “up in arms” about this movie: Since when has Hollywood done ANYTHING right? And I mean… ANYTHING?

See the movie. Don’t see the movie.

But it won’t surpass Bill Cosby’s rendition… ever.

Man of Steel — Observations

For the first time in a long time I ventured out to a movie theater with my youngest son, and figured out why I don’t go very often. It’s too expensive!

We did see Man of Steel, and I thought it was a fun movie. Some quick observations.

1. Superman is a Royals fan. That may ultimately doom the planet, but it certainly would be doomed quicker if he were a Cubs fan. I’m glad he landed in Kansas.

2. I had no idea how many “name” actors were in this movie. They just kept popping up!

3. It was a nice nod to Christopher Reeve in a couple of scenes where it was blatantly obvious this Superman had a Christopher Reeve “adjustment” in the CGI. Maybe it wasn’t intentional, but they should take credit for it anyway.

4. Five Guys Burgers really are good. That has nothing to do with the movie. (Although it could have for all the product placement that went on in that movie.) We went there before the movie and it really lived up to most of the hype.

5. It was too long. There was a point where I thought, “Good grief, ANOTHER scene of fighting and destruction?” It was probably the directors saying, “No, we want to the wipe out the OTHER half of Manhatta as well!” for a 2.5 hour movie, it was easily 20 minutes too long.

42 — Incredible Movie, Baseball Fan or Not

My wife and I were able to see a screening of “42,” a movie about Jackie Robinson breaking into the major leagues in 1947.

Being a huge fan of baseball, and watching Ken Burns’ “Baseball” series from PBS every year, and having read somewhat extensively on Jackie Robinson, this movies still had some nice surprises for me.

One thing I had read, and the thing that is always talked about in 1947, was the incredible verbal abuse Robinson had to endure. But even in interviews, people couldn’t bring themselves to actually say the things that were said in those days. In our day of verbal niceties, it’s just too hard to bring ourselves to say those things anymore.

The film had a few key spots where the characters didn’t hold back. One scene in particular is incredibly intense as the Phillies manager berates Robinson constantly and the language is incredibly harsh to hear. I wanted to come out of theater seat and go beat the guy up!

There were moments I knew had happened, and seeing them portrayed on film was powerful. The moment PeeWee Reese came over to put his arm around Robinson as they stood together at first base was deeply moving.

Baseball fan or not, this is a good movie to see. It deals with an important moment in baseball and in our nation.


I was finally able to see Les Miserables in the theater.

It is one of the most powerful pictures of grace I have seen in quite some time. What a beautiful story, and I thoroughly enjoyed the performances… ESPECIALLY Anne Hathaway… WOW!

It’s a beautiful story and it was beautiful to look into this amazing story of grace.