A Pro-Life Ethic Revisited

I want to return to my theme of a pro-life ethic. By this I don’t an ethic only anchored in abortion or right to life. It’s an ethic I want to build for ALL of life.

But I return to it because of the horrifying case of Kermit Gosnell. He was convicted of killing three babies after they were born. He performed many late term abortions.

For “pro-lifers” this is a rallying case.

Already pro-abortion people are couching this case in these terms:

Supporters of legalized abortion said the case offered a preview of what poor, desperate young women could face if abortion is driven underground with more restrictive laws.

I’m sorry. You may be trying to sell that, but I’m not buying. 

It’s just not plausible. Abortion is legal and these poor women were still exploited by this man. It was all “above ground” and babies who could have easily lived died.

This is a case where we truly need to walk through more of a true “pro-life” ethic. Not just a narrow view of limiting abortions. It’s helping the poor. It’s doing better in our education. It’s churches not abandoning the urban core so we can try and reach and teach young women.

It’s about having a pro-life ethic that will treat women well, so they will not be sexually exploited by men who abandon them. A pro-life ethic will need to address the SYSTEM. All the way through. Regardless if the original idea of some part of the system was “Republican” or “Democrat.”

Do not excuse Gosnell’s actions. Do NOT put this off as something that will further strengthen abortion laws. I am one “pro-lifer” who truly wants a conversation about later-term abortions ONLY. I have yet to meet a “pro-choice” person willing to concede. They are like NRA members foaming at the mouth if they are threatened with giving up 15 bullet magazines. THAT needs to stop.

I know there will not be any honest conversation out of this. Only excuses from the left. Only rants from the right. I know that.

But I pray for something more. And, if anyone is listening, I am willing (as one) to work for more. To work for BETTER. Because I know this: We can talk about poor women being on the margins, but those babies Gosnell killed were ALSO on the margins and they ALL deserve a voice.

One of these days my pleas may be heard. Until then, I pray. I ask. I plead.

4 responses to “A Pro-Life Ethic Revisited”

  1. God bless you, Dan.

  2. I have been searching myself for something that makes sense out of this gruesome case. Although I have called myself pro-choice, I waver on that label because of its connotations. I don’t want to see Roe vs Wade overturned, yet I feel disgusted when I think of what happened at this clinic in Philadelphia. If I am to l label myself pro-life, I face criticism from my fellow liberals. I do believe that in some instances, early abortions are warranted and maybe the best option on certain circumstances. My husband, a staunch pro-choicer, said he couldn’t get the gruesome images of the Gosnell story out of his head. I don’t like to use this tragedy to further an agenda, but maybe he just doesn’t know what an abortion truly is. I didn’t know myself 25 years ago when I went in for one. My experience aside, I feel compelled to think about these labels. I know that this country does not support babies after they’re born. Just look at our abysmal non-existent paid maternity leave, cutting of welfare programs, etc. To say that women should just not get pregnant, thereby eliminating any “need” for abortions and government help just doesn’t seem very realistic. There are so many women who are just hanging on by a thread and to force them to bring a life into this world seems almost cruel.
    Well, sorry for this rambling comment. My wish is that this country truly was pro-life, not just in words or labels, but in actuality.

    1. Thank you for those comments! We truly need more action all the way through the system. We are not honestly responding to the margins of our culture.

  3. just checked out your blog, and read ‘The Bland Gospel’, clicked on the link attack” radical” christianity, and when the idea to take on India, was not to fly out there but to dump the trash out inside the church and operate around it and in the midst of it, in hopes of moving people out of their comfort zones in a “radical” way.
    For some reason, I thought about the horrific pictures of the murdered babies that kermit Gosnell had killed, to some degree those images need to be seen as upfront as the idea to put the trash on the stage. We all need to take our blinders off and really see, what is happening around us, in our neighborhoods, not just back alleys, to women and children, (not just those who are poor are affected). Abortion is legal in this country, and it is very profitable.And we haven’t even begun to count the cost. Or realize what has been lost.

Leave a reply to one4drosas Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.