Revisiting the Reformation

Christianity Today is running a series of articles from world evangelical leaders on their views of what is needed in the 21st Century.

Rene Padilla’s column focused on a return to first principles, especially as it regards the first Lausanne Conference.

Padilla’s opening line:

A key problem of evangelical churches worldwide is the unilateral emphasis on numerical growth. For the sake of it, the gospel is watered down, church services are turned into entertainment, and Jesus’ commandment to make disciples is replaced by a strategy to enroll as many converts as possible.

Great observation. Now… what do we do about it?

I personally think we are too paralyzed to do anything about it. We’ve sold ourselves out to a monster we can no longer control. Some things may just need to collapse on us for anything good to come out.

This comes from observations over the years of ministries that simply get so big they can’t step away from the success they’ve built, even if that success is about to come crashing down around them. One in particular with my own denomination was a huge ministry and the head of the ministry was clearly warned by very caring people to put a halt on things. Take a sabbatical! Get away! Renew!

His response was chilling. He couldn’t step away. It was taking in too much money.

My guess is there are so many churches and ministries so entwined with financial and numerical success that halting some of the foolish pragmatic practices has too high a price. Some things will just have to come crashing down.

And then the question still becomes, “Will we learn anything?”

In the case of this huge ministry 20 plus years ago, I honestly don’t think anything was learned. We’re as gullible as ever on some of those personality driven ministries. Maybe this time it could be different. Maybe.

5 responses to “Revisiting the Reformation”

  1. this picture alone tells a thousand words… some being marketing, advertising, entertainment, financial success, maybe worshipping and following the person on the stage… hey this sort of sounds like a gigantic concert coming next year at the gopher stadium , 50,000 plus fans. yep.

    some things need to crash down. I pray we will be able to learn something too and it is unfortunate that we actually are paralyzed.

  2. This is a huge problem… its an issue I am grappling with myself as I prepare for pastoral ministry and I have blogged about the success syndrome. I think the answer lays in true accountability and it seems the pastor you spoke of wasn’t in a right place of being accountable.

    Perhaps it is one of the weaknesses of the leadership structure within the Pentecostal Church and one way to prevent this is to go a more Congregationalist / Baptist eldership overseer style of church structure?

    1. Craig, I’m not sure what you mean by Congregationalist/Baptist eldership style. Could you elaborate on that?

      Dan

  3. Here in Australia the AOG runs its church structure with the senior pastor having the final say. While the board can have a say in the running of the church… the pastor is really the boss…its his church!

    In the Baptist structure its the eldership who do the hiring and firing of the pastor within the local church structure. The congregationalist have a more democratic voice in that it is the whole church have a vote / say in the matter.

    In the example you gave about a pastor not being able to step away… the eldership should have been able to enforce a sabbatical of leave for this pastor if they truly recognised his need to do so.

  4. Thanks, Craig.
    The example I gave of a leader not stepping away was actually a parachurch ministry (though he had a church as well). But you’re right. There are some churches where the senior pastor in the US AOG is “it.”

    However, more of them are board-run churches. The boards hire and fire. A few older style ones are more congregational-driven.

    It’s becoming more autocratic, though. I had a conversation with a district leader a few months ago where he wanted me to make an executive decision on behalf of my church, but I just don’t operate that way. My own church runs with our board as a team. They are more like elders and I am “lead elder,” so to speak.

    I think more charismatic churches are far more autocratic, ala New Life Church in Colorado Springs, where Ted Haggard used to pastor.

Leave a reply to Craig Benno Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.