Grace

I teach Church History and Bible classes as an adjunct. This past week I had an Orthodox friend of mine come in and speak on Eastern Orthodoxy. He is a man that is a dear friend. We agree on very little politically. (Well, you’d think we don’t agree, but when we talk we are quite civil.) We have incredible conversations on politics, culture and theology.

One thing I have so deeply appreciated in Orthodox theology as I have learned more about it over the years is the willingness to embrace mystery. There are things we simply just don’t know. And we need to learn we honestly can’t explain absolutely everything.

I have to tell you, it is refreshing. The theological grenades just don’t get thrown around when we talk. He doesn’t call me “barely saved” if I have an Armininian point of view. He doesn’t call premillennialism “anti-gospel.” There are just things we don’t know fully. Have grace. Love Christ. Love his Church. Love your neighbor.

I may be “barely” saved and possibly “anti-gospel” to some (if I could ever figure out the millennium like so many other brilliant people seem to have already accomplished), but I do know that if someone really does “have it all together” and could be a Calvinist and/or Amillennial, I happen to love them, too. I happen to think we could disagree on some of that stuff and end of loving the exact same Jesus.

And I really hope we end up living close together in heaven. That way, every “day” (whatever a “day” may constitute in heaven), I’m going to show up at their door with a cup of coffee for them and say, “Look, I’m still here!”

Grace and peace to all, even those who have it figured out… but especially to those of us who don’t.

Barely saved and loving Jesus,

The Apprentice

8 responses to “Grace”

  1. Hi Dan.

    I agree with what you have written. One of my favourite lecturers is an Orthodox… love his emphasis on the psalms in building relationship with God.

    I’m not sure if you have posted this in response to my own provocative headline and post? I wasn’t making a call as to who is in and out…rather challenging a position that may not be Gospel centred in the outworking of inclusiveness…

    1. Calling a position “anti-gospel” is to make a call as to who is “in” and who is “out” in my opinion. Plus, as I explained in a response on your post, I think often the Pre-Mil classic view and Pre-Trib Dispensational view get too tied together and that causes problems. (Although I still wouldn’t call Pre-Trib “anti-gospel.”)

      Dan

  2. Hi Dan. I changed my title to more of a question then a statement…

    I still think any position that excludes another from the Gospel is an anti-gospel position.

    1. Craig, I apologize for my confusion here. What would you mean specifically by “any position that excludes another from the Gospel is an anti-gospel position?”

      If I said a Muslim is not a Christian and without Christ would not go heaven, is that anti-gospel? Could you elaborate that for me?

      Dan

  3. What I mean is if you exclude the Muslims from being ministered to and hearing the Gospel message, then no matter what you preach, its an anti gospel message.

    I hear so much about how bad it is for the Jews in Israel…without any consideration being given for our own brothers and sisters in Christ within the east who are persecuted by Israel…

    I read too much stuff that creates a bogeyman of Muslims and heroes of Isreal that I believe there is a mindset within Christendom that Muslims deserve all they get… if that is a outworking of your mindset…then your not in a position to preach the Gospel of salvation to both the Jews and the Muslims.

    1. Thanks for the clarification. I couldn’t agree with you more!

  4. šŸ˜‰ glad we could work that one out.

    1. Me, too. I hate it when we fight! LOL

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.